breathedout: Portrait of breathedout by Leontine Greenberg (bathtime)
A number of people had disliked Lytton Strachey—Harold Nicholson for instance. I went to see him in his rooms at the Albany one evening. He was sitting in a chair when I entered, open-eyed and apparently examining me critically. He said nothing. I stood before him shuffling my feet, shifting my weight from one side to another, murmuring something about the uncontroversial weather. He continued to glare. Suddenly a sort of convulsion ran through him, and he blinked. ‘I’m afraid I’ve been asleep,’ he said. 'Would you like a drink?’ I said that I would. But the question was apparently to satisfy his curiosity rather than my thirst. We began to talk. Lytton, he told me, resembled a bearded and bitchy old woman, rude rather than witty in society, injecting with his unnaturally treble voice jets of stinging poison into otherwise convivial gatherings. After about a quarter of an hour he looked across at his own large empty glass, which stood on a table between us, and and asked: 'Another drink?’ Hesitantly I agreed. But once again he made no move, and since I could see no sign of a drink in the room, we went on talking. Ten minutes later his gaze again fell on the glass, this time with incredulity. 'Do you want another drink?’ His tone was so sharp I felt it prudent to refuse.

Next day I told this story to Duncan Grant. Without a word, he leapt up and poured me a strong gin and tonic. It was half past ten in the morning.


—Michael Holroyd, from the double preface to Lytton Strachey: The New Biography, on conducting research for the first volume of his book, in 1963 or 1964.

OH DUNCAN, basically, is my takeaway here.
breathedout: Portrait of breathedout by Leontine Greenberg (bathtime)
There is one criticism of my biography made by Leonard Woolf that I still don’t accept. ‘I do not think that he [Lytton] had any very strong passions or emotions,’ he wrote, ’… he was hardly ever completely serious when he had a pen in his hand, writing the tragedy or comedy of his perpetual love affairs to Maynard Keynes, James [Strachey], or me…’ […]

[But] In Lytton Strachey’s life, comedy and tragedy were not separated, nor does his sense of humour imply a lack of seriousness—indeed quite the contrary. Homosexuality was 'irrelevant’ to Leonard Woolf and, to my mind, he underrated its significance in releasing Strachey from lonely confinement in his own body. He also underrated the intensity and precariousness of Strachey’s passions during the long shadowy period of history that followed Wilde’s imprisonment.


—Michael Holroyd in dialogue with Leonard Woolf in the preface to Lytton Strachey: The New Biography

Holroyd’s careful attention to the ways in which humour and seriousness coexisted (and even intensified each other) in Strachey’s life is one of the things I really prize about this biography, and about Lytton as a character. Unpacking this question of how intensely he felt things, and the exact nature of the things that he intensely felt, is both tricky and fascinating given that his self-presentation was habitually both extremely hyperbolic and also in some ways oddly understated.

Me being me I tend to read a lot of this as a mechanism for covering a fundamental mismatch between innate character, self image, and available social categories—he was, for example, obsessed with love affairs, obsessed with the idea of being in sexual-romantic love; I can’t read his letters and come away in any doubt that he had genuine passion around the activity “having love affairs.” But a lot of the time, that genuine passion actually manifests more in his relationships with people other than the supposed love object. The love affair is still generating the passionate response, but sometimes it’s as if the passionate response is sort of… displaced, and experienced more in his interactions with people he thinks of as friends or rivals (though in point of fact he was often also sleeping with them, at least sporadically). I can see how that would read as cold or dispassionate, but I don’t think it was; I think it was more just a non-standard triangulation of love and desire and passionate interpersonal connection. And I suspect that some, at least, of the hyperbole in his manner was a mechanism that sort of… disguised the non-standard boundaries and manifestations of his passionate attachments.
breathedout: Portrait of breathedout by Leontine Greenberg (bathtime)
Let us again pretend that life is a solid substance, shaped like a globe, which we turn about in our fingers. Let us pretend that we can make out a plain and logical story, so that when one matter is dispatched—love for instance—we go on, in an orderly manner, to the next.


—Virginia Woolf, The Waves
breathedout: Portrait of breathedout by Leontine Greenberg (bathtime)
But Virginia Woolf’s sexual squeamishness, which plays a part in the deflections and self-censorship of the novels, is combined with a powerful, intense sensuality, an erotic susceptibility to people and landscape, language and atmosphere, and a highly charged physical life. “Frigid” seems a ridiculously simplistic description of this complicated, polymorphous self.


—Hermione Lee, Virginia Woolf

I’m re-reading the section of Lee’s biography spanning 1913, for Strachey-related reasons, and remembering why I love it so much. Lee’s nuanced yet unflinching understanding and refusal to oversimplify her subjects, even when easy labels present themselves, is consistently inspirational to me.

Because I also have a long-term interest in fleshing out some workable, historically respectful version of Woolf’s sexuality for my eventual Virginia/Vita/Irene story, I am squirrelling away this kind of insight for future reference. The bit about the complicated, polymorphous self is very key to my love of Woolf and my understanding of her own self-conception, and this kind of… decentralized, non-genitally-centered but experientially intense eroticism is I think very compatible with the character arcs I have in mind.
breathedout: Portrait of breathedout by Leontine Greenberg (bathtime)
I thought to myself, as Lytton was talking, Now I will remember this & write it down in my diary tomorrow. And as I thought that, everything melted to mist. People don’t say things, except in biographies. True, Lytton was smooth & mild & melancholy beyond his wont; but with intimates, when talk is interesting, one sentence melts into another; heads & tails merge; there is never a complete beast.


—Virginia Woolf in her diary, Wednesday 15 February 1922
breathedout: Portrait of breathedout by Leontine Greenberg (bathtime)
[S]uddenly observed in the extreme distance, dressed in white satin and pearls and thickly powdered and completely haggard… Miss [Ethel] Sands! que diable allait-elle faire dans cette galère? — buggering Karin, I suppose, — the incorrigible old Sapphist —


—Lytton Strachey to Henry Lamb, 4 February 1913

I just thought this was an interesting citation re: historical language usage around sex; I wouldn’t have thought “buggering” would be used to apply to two women, especially since Strachey often used the term pretty explicitly (“the love of a catamite for a bugger,” for example, in September 1908). But it seems also to have occasionally stretched to mean something like “non-hetero sex”? It’s almost a kind of unexpected gesture of queer solidarity coming from Lytton, who often fell into the “ewwwwwwwwww, girls!” thought pattern when women came up.
breathedout: Portrait of breathedout by Leontine Greenberg (bathtime)
Ah! There are so many difficulties! So many difficulties! I want to write a novel about a Lord Chancellor and his naughty son, but I can’t for the life of me think of anything like the shadow of a plot, and then—the British public! Oh dear, let’s all go off to the Faroe Islands, and forget the existence of Robin Mayor and Mrs Humphrey Ward, and drink rum punch of an evening, and live happily ever after! It’s really monstrous that we shouldn’t be able to. Vanessa would cook for us. Why not?


—Lytton Strachey to Virginia Stephen (not yet Woolf), 27 September 1908

I’m just saying: I’ve read less convincing five-months-before-a-marriage-proposal letters.
breathedout: Portrait of breathedout by Leontine Greenberg (bathtime)
Is everything quite impossible? The world is too intolerably confused. I understand nothing. I see too many points and too few. I wander eternally between Duncan and Virginia and Sicilian prostitutes and chastity and resignation and the wildest hopes and despair. I’m dreadfully afraid that I may do something mad for one minute and ruin my life, but it’s just as likely that I shall never do anything at all. The only consolation—and the true one—is that whatever may happen or not happen in this frantic universe we shall always have been ourselves.


—Lytton Strachey to Leonard Woolf, 5 February 1909
breathedout: Portrait of breathedout by Leontine Greenberg (bathtime)
At Cambridge, the most memorable event of the summer [1909] term was staged by Geoffrey [Keynes], now in his final year at Pembroke. He and two friends had invited the novelist Henry James to visit Cambridge, Henry James accepting, so Maynard [Keynes] informed Duncan [Grant], ‘in an enormous letter even more complicated than a novel…’ On Sunday 13 June 1909 Maynard gave a breakfast party for Henry James at King’s. It was not a success. He had invited, among others, Harry Norton, who responded to each remark with manic laughter. Henry James was not amused. Desmond MacCarthy found him sitting disconsolately over 'a cold poached egg bleeding to death’ surrounded by a respectful circle of silent undergraduates. However, the visit did produce a classic James remark. Told that the youth with fair hair who sometimes smiled was called Rupert Brooke, who also wrote poetry which was no good, Henry James replied, 'Well, I must say I am relieved, for with that appearance if he had also talent it would be too unfair.’


—Robert Skidelsky, John Maynard Keynes: Hopes Betrayed (1883-1920)

Morals of this story:

  • Every single person in pre-WWI England wanted to bone Rupert Brooke.
  • Horrible breakfast parties read about at second hand are almost as amusing as horrible dinner parties read about at second hand.
  • The image of Henry James sitting disconsolately over a cold poached egg, surrounded by silent undergraduates while one lone man laughs manically, will be a balm to call upon in my darker moments.
  • If that doesn’t cheer me up, imagining the complexity of James’s acceptance letter should do the trick.
breathedout: Portrait of breathedout by Leontine Greenberg (bathtime)
Now is life very solid or very shifting? I am haunted by the two contradictions. This has gone on for ever; will last for ever; goes down to the bottom of the world—this moment I stand on. Also, it is transitory, flying, diaphanous. I shall pass like a cloud on the waves. Perhaps it may be that though we change, one flying after another, so quick, so quick, yet we are somehow successive and continuous, we human beings, and show the light through. But what is the light? I am impressed by the transitoriness of human life to such an extent that I am often saying a farewell.


—Virginia Woolf, A Writer's Diary
breathedout: Portrait of breathedout by Leontine Greenberg (bathtime)
Many people accept the idea that each of us has a certain resolute innerness—a kernel of selfhood that we can’t share with others. (Levin, at the end of “Anna Karenina,” calls it his “holy of holies,” and says that, no matter how close he grows to the people around him, there will always be “the same wall between my soul’s holy of holies and other people, even my wife.”) What interested Woolf was the way that we become aware of that innerness. We come to know it best, she thought, when we’re forced, at moments of exposure, to shield it against the outside world.

There can be something enjoyable, even revelatory about that feeling of self-protection, which is why we seek out circumstances in which we can feel more acutely the contrast between the outside world and our inner selves. Woolf was fascinated by city life—by the feeling of solitude-on-display that the sidewalk encourages, and by the way that “street haunting,” as she called it, allows you to lose and then find yourself in the rhythm of urban novelty and familiarity. She was drawn to the figure of the hostess: the woman-to-be-looked-at, standing at the top of the stairs, friendly to everyone, who grows only more mysterious with her visibility. (One of the pleasures of throwing a party, Woolf showed, is that it allows you to surprise yourself: surrounded by your friends, the center of attention, you feel your separateness from the social world you have convened.) She showed how parents, friends, lovers, and spouses can become more unknowable over time, not less—there is a core to their personhood that never gives itself up. Even as they put their lives on display, she thought, artists thrive when they maintain a final redoubt of privacy—a wellspring that remains unpolluted by the world outside. “A thing there was that mattered; a thing, wreathed about with chatter, defaced, obscured in her own life, let drop every day in corruption, lies, chatter,” Clarissa thinks, at the end of “Mrs. Dalloway.” Of course, it’s the chatter—the party—that helps her know that she has something to lose in the first place.


—Joshua Rothman, Virginia Woolf's Idea of Privacy
breathedout: Portrait of breathedout by Leontine Greenberg (bathtime)
Proust so titillates my own desire for expression that I can hardly set out the sentence. Oh, if I could write like that! I cry. And at the moment such is the astonishing vibration and saturation and intensification that he procures–there is something sexual in it–that I feel I can write like that, and seize my pen and then I can’t write like that. Scarcely anyone so stimulates the nerves of language in me: it becomes an obsession.


—Virginia Woolf in a letter to Roger Fry, 6 May 1922
breathedout: Portrait of breathedout by Leontine Greenberg (bathtime)
…she was very far from saying, even in the privacy of her own mind, “I am in love with you,” and that sentence might very well never have framed itself.


—Virginia Woolf, from Night and Day
breathedout: Portrait of breathedout by Leontine Greenberg (bathtime)
But what could be more absurd? It is, in fact, on the stroke of six; it is a winter’s evening; we are walking to the Strand to buy a pencil. How, then, are we also on a balcony, wearing pearls in June? What could be more absurd? Yet it is nature’s folly, not ours. When she set about her chief masterpiece, the making of man, she should have thought of one thing only. Instead, turning her head, looking over her shoulder, into each one of us she let creep instincts and desires which are utterly at variance with his main being, so that we are streaked, variegated, all of a mixture; the colours have run. Is the true self this which stands on the pavement in January, or that which bends over the balcony in June? Am I here, or am I there? Or is the true self neither this nor that, neither here nor there, but something so varied and wandering that it is only when we give the rein to its wishes and let it take its way unimpeded that we are indeed ourselves?


—Virginia Woolf, from "Street Haunting"
breathedout: Portrait of breathedout by Leontine Greenberg (bathtime)
… I beg for more illusions.
I can assure you, if you’ll make me up, I’ll make you …


—Virginia Woolf, in a letter to Vita Sackville-West, September 23, 1925
breathedout: Portrait of breathedout by Leontine Greenberg (bathtime)
He knows I’m not in love with him… I cried last night to think of a savage cynical fate which had made it impossible for my love ever to be used by you. You never knew, or never will know the very big and devastating love I had for you … I shall be with you in two weeks, how lovely that will be. And this summer we shall all be very happy together.


—Dora Carrington to Lytton Strachey, on her honeymoon with Ralph Partridge, 1921

A snippet of Dora Carrington’s love letter to Lytton Strachey, written while she was on honeymoon with the man he was in love with. “Lived in squares and loved in triangles,” etc.
breathedout: Portrait of breathedout by Leontine Greenberg (bathtime)
Dear Mrs Woolf
(That appears to be the suitable formula.) I regret that you have been in bed, though not with me—(a less suitable formula.)


—Vita Sackville-West, from a letter to Virginia Woolf dated 18 August 1933

How then

Dec. 12th, 2018 08:14 am
breathedout: Portrait of breathedout by Leontine Greenberg (bathtime)
How then, she had asked herself, did one know one thing or another about people, sealed as they were?


—Virginia Woolf, To the Lighthouse
breathedout: Portrait of breathedout by Leontine Greenberg (bathtime)
The hour should be the evening and the season winter, for in winter the champagne brightness of the air and the sociability of the streets are grateful. We are not then taunted as in the summer by the longing for shade and solitude and sweet airs from the hayfields. The evening hour, too, gives us the irresponsibility which darkness and lamplight bestow. We are no longer quite ourselves. As we step out of the house on a fine evening between four and six, we shed the self our friends know us by and become part of that vast republican army of anonymous trampers, whose society is so agreeable after the solitude of one’s own room. For there we sit surrounded by objects which perpetually express the oddity of our own temperaments and enforce the memories of our own experience. That bowl on the mantelpiece, for instance, was bought at Mantua on a windy day. We were leaving the shop when the sinister old woman plucked at our skirts and said she would find herself starving one of these days, but, “Take it!” she cried, and thrust the blue and white china bowl into our hands as if she never wanted to be reminded of her quixotic generosity. So, guiltily, but suspecting nevertheless how badly we had been fleeced, we carried it back to the little hotel where, in the middle of the night, the innkeeper quarrelled so violently with his wife that we all leant out into the courtyard to look, and saw the vines laced about among the pillars and the stars white in the sky. The moment was stabilized, stamped like a coin indelibly among a million that slipped by imperceptibly. There, too, was the melancholy Englishman, who rose among the coffee cups and the little iron tables and revealed the secrets of his soul — as travellers do. All this — Italy, the windy morning, the vines laced about the pillars, the Englishman and the secrets of his soul — rise up in a cloud from the china bowl on the mantelpiece. And there, as our eyes fall to the floor, is that brown stain on the carpet. Mr. Lloyd George made that. “The man’s a devil!” said Mr. Cummings, putting the kettle down with which he was about to fill the teapot so that it burnt a brown ring on the carpet.


—Virginia Woolf, "Street Haunting," from The Death of the Moth

A conversation in Antidiogenes chat inspired me to dig up this essay, and man, the paragraph above is just fucking spectacular. The way it twists and wanders, mimicking the essay’s subject (the joys of rambling around London streets), and yet is always under perfect control. The way it evokes so precisely the investment of experience into objects, and the way the paraphernalia of our everyday lives then haunts us, surrounds us, both comforting and oppressive.

Just. The SENTENCES. I am torn between rapture and despair.
breathedout: Portrait of breathedout by Leontine Greenberg (bathtime)
I just miss you, in a quite simple desperate human way.


—Vita Sackville-West, excerpt of a letter to Virginia Woolf
Page generated Jul. 17th, 2025 08:04 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios